Riddle 7 - The terrain

0

Did the terrain come over vividly to you? Tidal mudflats are extremely dangerous for those who don't know the area well - equivalent places in England include Morecambe Bay, the Solway Firth, and The Wash. The tide can come in at Morecambe Bay at up to 10 mph, and there are regular rescues and deaths out on the sands. Someone who tried to replicate the journey of this book said "I set out to recreate their journey at low tide the next day. On foot. I realised just how foolish the idea had been when I spoke with my hosts that evening; they were horrified at my venture and were full of tales of how unwary walkers on the sands had been swept away and drowned." Did the physical danger of the terrain come over clearly enough in the story? What stood out as the most obvious threat to the protagonists?

Comments

  • 1
    I was quite impressed when I saw Morecambe Bay, and there is no way I would go for a walk upon it. I think that was part of the fantasy of the book. The story in your comment just shows how difficult it is for people to connect up descriptions with actuality in an accurate way. People who have actual experience can see these things, but what is common sense is almost always very local.
  • 1

    The terrain is a major factor in the book, and the story mostly comes out of the terrain and its military implications. What I thought was missing was the element of danger in it. As I said elsewhere, there's very little jeopardy coming from the terrain.

    Dollman's attempt to sink the Dulicibella happens before the book starts. The long dingy trip to Memmert is long rather than dangerous. Characters routinely go for walks on sandbanks at low tide, and there's no concern that they'll get trapped on them in the tide.

    More could have been done to make the environment a source of activity rather than a well-drawn background.

  • 1

    I thought the trip in the fog to Memmert was breathtaking in it's danger! It was a tour de force of sailing.

  • 0

    @clash_bowley said:
    I thought the trip in the fog to Memmert was breathtaking in it's danger! It was a tour de force of sailing.

    It's a place where the written version comes over much better than the film - in that version you just see them going through mist and stuff and don't really get much sense of how difficult it would have been. There's a bit of voice-over saying something like how remarkable it was, but sadly it doesn;t really come over nearly so well as in the book.

  • 2
    edited August 6

    Here is an aerial photo of part of the East Frisian Islands, showing low tide conditions. I believe the leftmost island shown is Norderney: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwQZIy2aMAkdzBA?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

  • 0

    @clash_bowley said:
    Here is an aerial photo of part of the East Frisian Islands, showing low tide conditions. I believe the leftmost island shown is Norderney: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwQZIy2aMAkdzBA?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

    How excellent! Shows off the watersheds behind each of the islands really well

  • 1

    This was a case where my ignorance of the terrain probably played a huge role in why I didn't get the book. I pictured Anne of Green gables sand dunes and wondered what the big deal was.

Sign In or Register to comment.